As I mentioned previously, there has been continued improvement in the quality, the realism, of artificial flowers. Production techniques have been developed to manufacture faux blooms that increasingly resemble the real thing. There is a web site, hibiscusflorals.com, which has published an article that defines the quality grades of artificial flowers. There are numerous commercial sites on the web that have adopted these standards in promoting their own products, so the Hibiscus scale has become influential among the trade. This scale recognizes six grades of artificial flowers. We are going to look at specimens that typify the standards of each grade, as I understand them, and you will see what to look for in appraising the quality of the stems and arrangements being offered for sale. Like any product, higher quality correlates with higher cost.
Example of a grade 1 specimen: Poinsettia |
Picture of a poorly molded stem. |
This photo shows a calyx, which is not an actual part of the poinsettia's natural structure. |
Now let’s examine the biological accuracy of this specimen. There are not enough leaves. The poinsettia is a lush plant, while this artificial has only two leaves on the stem (Of course, certain conditions will affect the vigor of a plant, but I do not think that this specimen was manufactured to illustrate that point.) Most significantly, the red “blossom” atop the stem is contained within a calyx that sets it apart from the leaves. Certain varieties of plants have a calyx, a cup like structure of green petals, called sepals, which lie at the base of the blossom. However, the poinsettia does not have a calyx. The red “flowers” of the poinsettia are actually leaves that develop coloration due to carefully timed exposure to light. They are called bracts.
This specimen is poorly manufactured and is not anatomically correct. These factors contribute to the placement of this artificial flower in the first, or lowest quality, grade of artificial flowers.